Mississippi Adequate Education Program (MAEP)
  
Passed by the Mississippi Legislature in 1997, the Mississippi Adequate Education Program (MAEP) is a law that provides a formula that is designed to ensure an adequate education for every Mississippi child -- whether that child lives in a “wealthy” community or a “poor” one. It is designed to provide schools the resources necessary for adequate student achievement. 

Base Student Cost/Local Contribution
The MAEP formula produces a base student cost, the amount that is required to provide each student an adequate education in a Mississippi school.  Each district is required to provide up to 27% of the base student cost through a local contribution made up of local ad valorem taxes.  The state funds the difference between what a local community is able to provide (up to a maximum of 27%) and the total base student cost, and that amount is multiplied by the school district's average daily attendance to get the district's MAEP allocation. 

The formula is recalculated every four years and is adjusted for inflation in the intervening years by multiplying 40% of the base student cost by the current rate of inflation as computed by the State's economist. 

High Growth Formula
Districts that have had a growth in enrollment in each of the three consecutive years prior to the appropriation are awarded additional "high growth" funding by adding the average growth for the three prior years to the district's average daily attendance. 

Click here to see a detailed description of the MAEP formula, the base student cost calculation, and how districts are chosen for inclusion in the calculation of the base student cost.
 

The MAEP provides funding for:
·        Teacher and other district employee salaries, retirement and insurance
·        Textbooks and other instructional materials
·        Basic operational costs (utilities, facility maintenance, etc.)

The MAEP formula does not include funding for:
·        Administrators' salaries (principals' and superintendents' salaries are funded through local taxes)
·       
Transportation (operation of buses)
·        Special education
·        Vocational education
·        Gifted education
·        Alternative education
·       
Teacher supplies
·        Increases in insurance premiums
·        Building funds for facility maintenance and improvement
·        Salary increases mandated by the legislature for the next fiscal year
·        School improvement programs

Add-ons:
The following are funded by the state as "add-on" programs and are provided for outside of the formula:
·        Transportation
·        Special education
·        Vocational education
·        Gifted education

·        Alternative education

The 60% Myth
Politicians often use the percent of the state budget that is dedicated to public schools as evidence of their support of K-12 education.  You have probably heard them claim that education makes up over 60% of the total state budget.  That is simply not true.  While it is true that all of education - including universities and community colleges - make up about 61% of the General Fund portion of the state budget, the General Fund represents less than 1/2 of the total state budget, exclusive of federal funds.  Approximately 55% of state taxes and fees are diverted to special funds and are not considered a part of the General Fund appropriations.  But this diverted revenue, like General Fund revenue, is made up of state taxes and fees paid by the people of Mississippi.  It is simply diverted to specific state agencies rather than going into the General Fund.
 

The truth is, when all state taxes and fees are considered, K-12 education makes up about 23% of the state budget - a far cry from 60%.  When federal funds are included, K-12 education makes up about 16.5% of the state budget.

The History of MAEP
In 1997, the Mississippi Legislature passed the Mississippi Adequate Education Program (MAEP) in an attempt to address two primary problems: low student achievement and inequity among school districts. 

In 1997, Mississippi school children were being outperformed by children in other states. Almost every other state was spending more per student than was Mississippi, though most of those states faced fewer challenges. 
 

In addition, Mississippi school districts in communities with a low tax base were significantly worse off than those in more prosperous communities. More affluent communities were able to supplement their state funding, thus affording their children a better education than was offered children who happened to reside in poorer districts. This resulted in a system of education with great inequities and in which geography determined the level of education a Mississippi child received.  

After two years of study by consultants, legislators and other experts, the Legislature drafted and passed (over a governor’s veto) two pieces of legislation: the Mississippi Accountability System and the Mississippi Adequate Education Program (MAEP). 

The Mississippi Accountability System raised significantly the standards teachers and students were required to meet. The Mississippi Curriculum Test (MCT) and MCT2 were developed to measure student achievement, and schools are rated according to students’ scores. The Children First Act of 2009 raised the stakes even higher, calling for the removal of superintendents and school boards in chronically low-performing schools.

The Mississippi Adequate Education Program is a promise by legislators to provide teachers and schools the resources necessary to bring students up to the standards required by the accountability system. The accountability program rewards “successful” performance, and the MAEP provides a formula that determines the funding necessary to produce “successful” programs. This law also provides a ceiling on the portion of that funding a local school district is required to provide.  

The MAEP is intended to erase earlier inequities by ensuring children in every region of Mississippi an adequate, or successful, education – even those children who happen to reside in poor districts. The formula determines the per-student cost of a successful education, then subtracts the local district’s responsibility. The difference is the level of funding the law requires the state to provide our public schools.

 Accountability standards have been increased significantly, and students, principals and teachers are held to those levels of achievement.  It is important that the Legislature continue to provide schools the resources necessary to provide students a successful level of education. 

 

 
 
TPC continues to grow...
now over 60,000 strong!
    
          
 
Sign up to receive our email updates by clicking on the button below.



 
 

 
To learn which legislators represent you, visit VoteSmart.org.


 
 
 
 
FOLLOW US ON
 
                                                    

 
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Click here for an explanation
of the 2006 MAEP vote.